20081128

Individualism

Lines from The Fountain Head , written by my favourite philosopher, Ayn Rand spoken by Gary Cooper in the film of the same title:

........Thousands of years ago, the first man discovered how to make fire, he was probably burnt at the stake, he taught his brother to light, but he left them a gift they have not conceived and he lift up darkness of the earth.

Throughout the centuries, there were men who took first steps down new roads, armed with nothing but their own vision, the great creators, the thinkers, the artists, the scientists, the inventors stood alone against men of their time; every new thought was opposed, every new invention was denounced, but the man with un-borrowed vision went ahead. They fought, they suffered, and they paid but they won. No creator was prompted by a desire to please his brothers. His brothers hated the gift he offered. His truth was his only motive; his work was his only goal. His work not those who use it, his creation not the benefits others derived from it, the creation which gave form to his truth. He held his truth above all things and against all man. He went ahead whether others agreed with him or not. With his integrity as his only banner, he served nothing and no one. He lived for himself and only by living for himself was he able to achieve the things that are the glory of mankind. Such is the nature of achievement.

Man cannot survive except through his mind, he comes on earth unarmed. His brain is his only weapon. But the mind is the attribute of the individual, there is no such thing as a collective brain, the man who thinks must think and act on his own. The reasoning, the mind cannot work under any form of compulsion, it cannot be subordinated to the needs, opinion or wishes of others. It is not an object of sacrifice. The creator stands on his own judgement, the parasite follows the opinion of others. The creator thinks; the parasite follows. The creator produces; the parasite loots. The creator’s concern is conquest of nature; the parasite concern is conquest of man. The creator requires independence, he neither serves nor rules. He deals with man by free exchange and voluntary choice. The parasite seeks power, he wants to bind all man together in common action and common slavery. He claims that man is only a tool for the use of others that he must think as they think, act as they act and live in selfless joyless servitude to any need but his own.

Look at history. Everything we have, every great achievement has come from the independent work of some independent mind. Every horror and destruction came from attempts to force man into a herd of brainless soulless robots without will, hope and dignity. It is an ancient conflict, it has another name; the individual against the collective. Our country, the noblest country in the history of man was based on a principle of individualism. The principle of man’s inedible right. It was a country where a man was free to seek his own happiness, to gain and produce not to give up and renounce; to prosper not to starve; to achieve not to plunder; to hold as his highest possession, a sense of personal value, and as his highest virtue, his self respect. Look at the result that is what the collectivists are now asking you to destroy as much as the earth has been destroyed.

I am an architect. I know what is to come by the principle as it is built. We are approaching a world which I cannot permit myself to live. My ideas are my property. They were taken from me by force, by breach of contract. No appeal was left to me. It was believed that my work belong to others to do with as they please. They had claim upon me without my consent. That is my duty to serve them without choice or reward. Now you know why I dynamited Cortland. I designed Cortland. I made it possible. I destroyed it. I agree to design it for the purpose of seeing it built as I wish. That was the price I set for my work. I was not paid. My building was disfigured at the whim of others who took all benefits of my work and gave me nothing in return. I came here to say that I do not recognise anyone’s rights to want one minute of my life, nor to any part of my energy, nor to any achievement of mine, no matter who makes the claim. It has to be said. The world is perishing from an orgy of self sacrificing. I came here to be heard, in the name of every man of independence still left in the world. I wanted to state my terms. I don’t care to work or live on any others. My terms are a man’s right to exist for his own sake.....

20081126

BIG BIG BIG

The previous post feature the "Mountain Building" by Bjarke Ingle of Bjarke Ingle Group (BIG). As his firm name suggests, he is one of the BIG time starchitect in the making if he is not already yet.
When he came down to KL for Architecture Forum, he received an overwhelming applause, partly due to his cool, 'I don't take myself too seriously', outlook, which i guess is very appealing to young designers' (mis)conception of the uber cool profession of architect. Which reminds me of what my ex-boss told us, after the forum - they (these uber cool architects)make a very small percentage of the architecture fraternity. Well, there is no harm done wanting to be in that small percentage.

Below is his talk in Ideas Festival 2008

20081106

A few days ago, I bought the book “Ecodesign – A Manual for Ecological Design” written by Malaysian architect extraordinaire, Dr. Ken Yeang. Dr. Yeang’s approach on architecture that he is known for is very much reflected in this book. Since I have yet to really go through the whole book, I’ll give you excerpts from the book (first 30 pages) that caught my eye and brain.

“Humans are a polluting species in nature. In fact, of all the species in nature, humans are the most polluting.”

“...., humans have now begun to behave like ‘dogs as careless defecators’. They have strewn their faeces and other rubbish and debris carelessly about the landscape.”

“Many designers wrongly believe that if they stuff a building with enough ecogadgets such as solar collectors, wind generators, photovoltaic and biodigestors then they will instantly have an ecological design. Of course, nothing could be further from the truth.”

“...., ecodesign is the seamless benign environmental integration of all our human-made environment and all our human activities with the natural environment, from the source to production to operation to demolition and eventual assimilation into the ecosystems and biospheric processes.”

“In the case of built structures (architecture, structures of any sort and infrastructures) ecodesign considerations include not just the design of the entire built systems but also what happens during their manufacture, transportation and construction through to their eventual reuse, recycling and reintegration.”

The book is not the typical architectural books that we architects are used to, you know the kind with a lot of pretty pictures, details, plans and sections of buildings, built and un-built. To me it brought me back down memory lane during my A-Levels. This book is as thick as our Physics text book. This Ecodesign book is 500 pages thick, soft covered, high quality print text book for designers (read anyone whose activities impinge in one way or another on the natural environment).

20081104

change, change, change

Relating to my earlier post on the film who killed the electric car? last night I saw the ad on TV by Shell, the big oil company on a new type of fuel. The imageries are a mix of smoke spewing from cars and industries, forest fires and the sorts. And today I read on news article on Obamas proposed reform on fuel energy. From what I gather reading the article, if Uncle Sams energy policy is geared towards renewable energy, hence there is no need to import (read steal) fossil fuels from other countries (read Middle East) therefore indirectly a new American Era or Dream is born. This will change the rest of the world view / perception on America and once again the so called American Dream where everyone has grown accustom to pre 9/11 shall resurface.


Last night, whilst browsing some books at Borders BTS, I came across the book Small, Flat & Crowded the latest book by Thomas Friedman (The World is Flat) talks about the same thing. Energy policy and why the world (read America and China) need to change their energy usage habits. The best quote that I read, not sure by whom and where is If you want the world/earth to remain the same, you need to change. Well said. If you and I expect the earth to remain the same, meaning there is still water to drink, food to eat, air to breath, then you and I need to change first.




Well, it is not easy to change, fellow friends. Change is hard. Why change? Sorry to tell you, that you aint
got no choice, earthlings!! Here are some tips, on getting people to change. Dont blame me for any door slammings, slipper throwing, middle finger-ings that you may encounter when advocating. You have been warned


1. Find something they care about (gardening, futsal, their kids' health, Mawi world) and talk about the environment as it relates to that issue specifically. Get your creative juices going, and yes, try relating environment to our dear Mawi.


2. Talk ringgits and cents. Tell them how much money you've saved by installing CFL light bulbs, taking the bus and planting low maintenance plants (cactus). It works because we dont need to learn new morality; wrap our heads around scientific evidence; or face our deepest fears. It taps into the part of our brains thats been conditioned since birth to think MONEY = GOOD." Money saved, is money well spent.


3. Green gifting is great. Present your friends with a hip canvas grocery bag, cool reusable water bottle, some green cleaning products or organic chocolate bar. Chances are they'll enjoy it and begin to associate green living with good living.


4. Blind them with science. Of course, your Naza Ria (or any other fuel guzzlers on our roads)-driving Cik Timah may still think global warming is a hoax. Check out Coby Beck's "How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic" for tips on chatting with her, but keep in mind she may never embrace an eco-existence.


5. Show by doing. Walking to the grocery store is better when you have a friend along; invite yours for 'exercise' and then pop into the supermarket while you're out. Making a home cooked meal with a friend (even if they just keep you company) can show them how luscious cooking (instead of ordering in) can be.


6. Make it fun. Picking your own veggies and flowers at the farmer's market is a feast for the senses, bike riding makes everyone feel young again, and taking the kids (theirs and yours) to the park for a game of football or kite flying instead of sitting in front of the TV will give everyone a healthy, happy glow.

20081103

Modern Talking

2 months in at my present work place, what have I learned so far? Besides all that comes under the design studio work environment, appreciation amongst people; colleagues and bosses alike are abundance here. "Thank you", "good job", "great" are words that you hear every day, as natural as breathing fresh air con of a newly occupied building which happens to be where my office is now. That’s what you hear anyways, the office is pin drop quiet.

Are we as Malaysians not trained to say thank you as often as we drink teh tarik in the morning? Or are we just too stucked up? Of course we do smile a lot. That’s what most tourists would say when a camera is put on their faces and asked “what do you think of Malaysians, SIR?”

Did you notice that I wrote design studio instead of architect firm? Well it is an architect firm sort of but the environment is very much studio like. For one, we do not have CAD monkeys here. Everyone is a designer including our office manageress. She designs our yearly holidays, our cheques every end of the month, and sometimes our weekends by emailing us where the next warehouse sale is. Here I get to explore skills that I never had the chance to do before because of work load reasons. Within 4 weeks after using the program SketchUp, I managed to do basic 3d modeling enough for quick presentation standard.



These images are series of progression from week 1 of starting the SketchUp program, getting the basic form to Week 4, getting the materials in. There is no rendering applied, as the program name suggest it is just a sketch up tool. Very fast,very effective and get the message across effortlessly. No fancy lighting. No fancy materials. Just pure basic synapses to pen (in this case, keyboard) drawings. Honestly, the design is too Miesian for my taste, but working with the director on the design which by the way was part of Foster-ism a while back, I can fully understand. The design is very practical, simple and well, Miesian to say the least. If I have it my way, the whole pavilion will be covered with creepers, the form can be slightly organic maintaining the proportion of space for efficiency reasons (gfa & nfa wise) a whole lot less of glazing.

Back in the old days, Architecture 101, architecture students tend to go minimalist because for the fact that you need to draw a lot less. Bits of horizontal lines there, vertical lines here, one door here, flat roof there, elevate it for the floating effect and voila! you done. That was then, but minimalist or the original term modernist requires more poetic thoughts, combining essence of the surrounding elements. Here are some examples of the modernists’ approach combining the old and the new.

20081101

eco film festival 2008 @ aswara, kl

i think we go green!!! some shots of the fest filtered green. one thing that is not in the spirit of the fest is when people smoke a cigarette, the butt is not where it should be, the bin!! forget about the CO2 released.

i watched the film "who killed the electric car?" by chris paine. the guilty parties are the government,consumer, oil companies and vehicles manufacturer, hydrogen fuel cells & california air resource board. please google about EV1 to find out more.